Monthly Archives: October 2009

The pundits’ dilemma

Mark Liberman says this in the Language Log today, among other good points: Overall, the promotion of interesting stories in preference to accurate ones is always in the immediate economic self-interest of the promoter. It’s interesting stories, not accurate ones, … Continue reading

Posted in Mechanism Design, Public Economics, microeconomics | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Clairaut’s Theorem

For some reason that I do not fully understand, the equality of cross partial derivatives gets all munged up, in naming at least, when taught in the typical math econ class, including the one when I was an undergraduate student. … Continue reading

Posted in Mathematics | Leave a comment

Paul Romer on Elinor Ostrom’s Nobel prize

My old teacher Paul Romer has a fantastic post on Ostrom’s prize award. A long quote follows, but I do strongly recommend the whole thing: Most economists think that they are building cranes that suspend important theoretical structures from a … Continue reading

Posted in Mechanism Design, Public Economics, microeconomics | Leave a comment

Glaeser on the “Nobel” prize in economics

Ed Glaeser has a nice essay explaining the work of the awardees of this year’s prize in the New York Times.

Posted in Mechanism Design, Public Economics | Leave a comment

Levitt on the “Nobel” prize in economics 2009

Here is Steven Levitt admitting that he should have known about Ostrom. Nice to see an admission that over-narrowness is not very productive in science.

Posted in Mechanism Design, Public Economics | Leave a comment

Swedish National Bank’s Prize in memory of Alfred Nobel, 2009

Congratulations to Elinor Ostrom and Oliver Williamson for the honor they received. I wish I had time to discuss this properly right now, but class prep is calling. Meanwhile, here is a post by Alex Tabarrok on Wiliamson and one … Continue reading

Posted in Mechanism Design, Public Economics | Leave a comment